Cairo, Egypt: Supreme Council of Antiquities Press, 2002.Illustration of canopic jars, representing the sons of Horus (Illustration by Esther Curtis) Why was the heart left within the body? Brief communication: twentieth-century replication of an Egyptian mummy: implications for paleopathology. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2001. Death and the afterlife in ancient Egypt. Egyptian mummies: unraveling the secrets of an ancient art. Adipocere in postmortem imaging using multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 17 Jackowski C, Thali M, Sonnenschein M, Aghayev E, Yen K, Dirnhofer R.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Egyptian mummies: radiological atlas of the collections in the National Museum of Antiquities in Leiden. High-resolution spiral computed tomography with multiplanar reformatting, 3D surface- and volume rendering: a nondestructive method to visualize ancient Egyptian mummification techniques. 14 Jansen RJ, Poulus M, Taconis W, Stoker J.Nasal endoscopy and CT study of Pharaonic and Roman mummies. 13 Gaafar H, Abdel-Monem MH, Elsheikh S.Paleoradiology: advanced CT in the evaluation of nine Egyptian mummies. Head and skull base features of nine Egyptian mummies: evaluation with high-resolution CT and reformation techniques. Modern imaging and endoscopic biopsy techniques in Egyptian mummies. 10 Notman DN, Tashjian J, Aufderheide AC, et al.CT examination of eleven Egyptian mummies. Whole-body three-dimensional multidetector CT of 13 Egyptian human mummies. 8 Cesarani F, Martina MC, Ferraris A, et al.Comely Wenuhotep: computed tomography of an Egyptian mummy. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the mummy Wenuhotep. 6 Pickering RB, Conces DJ Jr, Braunstein EM, Yurco F.3-D reconstruction of an ancient Egyptian mummy using x-ray computer tomography. 5 Baldock C, Hughes SW, Whittaker DK, et al.ENT aspects of the mummification of the head in ancient Egypt: an imaging study. 4 Motamed M, Alusi G, Campos J, East C.Virtual reconstruction and morphological analysis of the cranium of an ancient Egyptian mummy. Facial reconstruction of a wrapped Egyptian mummy using MDCT. 2 Cesarani F, Martina MC, Grilletto R, et al.Computed tomography of ancient Egyptian mummies. Artificial mummification was performed on every continent, especially in South and Central America. Animals were also mummified to provide food for the deceased, to accompany the deceased as pets, because they were seen as corporal manifestations of deities, and as votive offerings. After the body was dehydrated, the body cavities were rinsed and packed to restore the body’s former shape. The most important, and probably the most lengthy, phase was desiccation. First, the body was cleaned with a natron solution then internal organs were removed through the cribriform plate and abdomen. Their use of evisceration followed by desiccation with natron (a compound of sodium salts) to halt putrefaction and prevent rehydration was so effective that their embalmed bodies have survived for nearly 4500 years. The ancient Egyptians are most famous for this. The purpose of artificial mummification was to preserve that person’s morphologic features by delaying or arresting the decay of the body. Mummification processes can be summarized as “artificial,” when the procedure was performed on a body with the aim of preservation, or as “natural,” when the body’s natural environment resulted in preservation. CT also supplies three-dimensional information about the scanned object. It allows for noninvasive insight, especially with virtual endoscopy, which reveals detailed information about the mummy’s sex, age, constitution, injuries, health, and mummification techniques used. Computed tomography (CT) has proved to be a valuable investigative tool for mummy research and is the method of choice for examining mummies.